reviewBMJ OpenJul 1, 2016GOLD OA

Review of 99 self-report measures for assessing well-being in adults: exploring dimensions of well-being and developments over time

University of Exeter

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Objective

Investigators within many disciplines are using measures of well-being, but it is not always clear what they are measuring, or which instruments may best meet their objectives. The aims of this review were to: systematically identify well-being instruments, explore the variety of well-being dimensions within instruments and describe how the production of instruments has developed over time.

Design

Systematic searches, thematic analysis and narrative synthesis were undertaken. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, EconLit, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and CINAHL from 1993 to 2014 complemented by web searches and expert consultations through 2015. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Instruments were selected for review if they were designed for adults (≥18 years old), generic (ie, non-disease or context specific) and available in an English version.

No related works found for this paper.

Funding