The dysconnection hypothesis (2016)
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · University College London · +5 more institutions
Abstract
Twenty years have passed since the dysconnection hypothesis was first proposed (Friston and Frith, 1995; Weinberger, 1993). In that time, neuroscience has witnessed tremendous advances: we now live in a world of non-invasive neuroanatomy, computational neuroimaging and the Bayesian brain. The genomics era has come and gone. Connectomics and large-scale neuroinformatics initiatives are emerging everywhere. So where is the dysconnection hypothesis now? This article considers how the notion of schizophrenia as a dysconnection syndrome has developed - and how it has been enriched by recent advances in clinical neuroscience. In particular, we examine the dysconnection hypothesis in the context of (i) theoretical…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 24.21
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 149
Authors
4- KFKarl FristonCorresponding
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London
- HRHarriet R. Brown
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University College London
- JSJakob Siemerkus
University of Zurich, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering
- KΕKlaas Ε. Stephan
University of Zurich, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering
Topics & keywords
- Connectomics
- Neuroinformatics
- Frith
- Neuroimaging
- Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming)
- Neuroscience
- Context (archaeology)
- Cognitive science