Abstract
Despite the wide application of the label “populist” in the 2016 election cycle, there has been little systematic evidence that this election is distinctive in its populist appeal. Looking at historical trends, contemporary rhetoric, and public opinion data, we find that populism is an appropriate descriptor of the 2016 election and that Donald Trump stands out in particular as the populist par excellence. Historical data reveal a large “representation gap” that typically accompanies populist candidates. Content analysis of campaign speeches shows that Trump, more so than any other candidate, employs a rhetoric that is distinctive in its simplicity, anti-elitism, and collectivism. Original survey data show…
Citation impact
552
total citations
- FWCI
- 284.00
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 43
Citations per year
Authors
2Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Populism
- Elitism
- Optimal distinctiveness theory
- Rhetoric
- Politics
- Appeal
- Political science
- Authoritarianism
No related works found for this paper.