articleNew England Journal of MedicineAug 30, 2016Closed access

Drug-Eluting or Bare-Metal Stents for Coronary Artery Disease

Norwegian Womens Public Health Association

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Limited data are available on the long-term effects of contemporary drug-eluting stents versus contemporary bare-metal stents on rates of death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and stent thrombosis and on quality of life.

Methods

We randomly assigned 9013 patients who had stable or unstable coronary artery disease to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the implantation of either contemporary drug-eluting stents or bare-metal stents. In the group receiving drug-eluting stents, 96% of the patients received either everolimus- or zotarolimus-eluting stents. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause and nonfatal spontaneous myocardial infarction after a median of 5 years of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included repeat revascularization, stent thrombosis, and quality of life.

Citation impact

541
total citations
FWCI
77.64
Percentile
100%
References
21
Citations per year

Authors

25

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention
  • Conventional PCI
  • Hazard ratio
  • Myocardial infarction
  • Internal medicine
  • Stent
  • Zotarolimus
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.