reviewJournal of Evaluation in Clinical PracticeSep 4, 2016Closed access

Minimal clinically important difference for change in 6‐minute walk test distance of adults with pathology: a systematic review

Campbell University

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Methods

Relevant literature was identified by searches of 3 electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health), examination of article reference lists, and consultation with an expert. Inclusion necessitated that articles (1) be original, full length, and peer reviewed, (2) report an MCID for the 6MWT, and (3) focus on adults with medical issues. Articles were excluded if the MCID was determined by a procedure other than receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Articles were abstracted for information on participants, interventions, 6MWT distance, and the determination of MCID. Quality was assessed using a hybrid 9-item (0- to 18-point) instrument.

Results

Six articles were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The populations studied included people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, coronary artery disease, diffuse parenchymal lung disease, and non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis and adults with fear of falling. Mean baseline 6MWT distances ranged from 295 to 551 m. The MCIDs for which the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was at least 0.70 ranged from 14.0 to 30.5 m.

Citation impact

690
total citations
FWCI
21.08
Percentile
100%
References
17
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Minimal clinically important difference
  • Medicine
  • Receiver operating characteristic
  • Inclusion and exclusion criteria
  • Context (archaeology)
  • Physical therapy
  • Psychological intervention
  • Quality of life (healthcare)
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Reduced inequalities
No related works found for this paper.

Funding