articleTrialsSep 12, 2016GOLD OA

How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline

EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research · University of Alberta · +7 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Background

In cooperation with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative, the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) initiative aimed to develop a guideline on how to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes (i.e., constructs or domains) included in a "Core Outcome Set" (COS). A COS is an agreed minimum set of outcomes that should be measured and reported in all clinical trials of a specific disease or trial population.

Methods

Informed by a literature review to identify potentially relevant tasks on outcome measurement instrument selection, a Delphi study was performed among a panel of international experts, representing diverse stakeholders. In three consecutive rounds, panelists were asked to rate the importance of different tasks in the selection of outcome measurement instruments, to justify their choices, and to add other relevant tasks. Consensus was defined as being achieved when 70 % or more of the panelists agreed and when fewer than 15 % of the panelists disagreed.

Citation impact

1,134
total citations
FWCI
190.34
Percentile
100%
References
20
Citations per year

Authors

8

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Outcome (game theory)
  • Medicine
  • Guideline
  • Core (optical fiber)
  • Set (abstract data type)
  • Medical physics
  • Intensive care medicine
  • Pathology
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Partnerships for the goals
No related works found for this paper.

Funding