Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses
Duke University · Clinical Research Institute · +18 more institutions
Abstract
Since publication of the report by the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine in 1996, researchers have advanced the methods of cost-effectiveness analysis, and policy makers have experimented with its application. The need to deliver health care efficiently and the importance of using analytic techniques to understand the clinical and economic consequences of strategies to improve health have increased in recent years.
To review the state of the field and provide recommendations to improve the quality of cost-effectiveness analyses. The intended audiences include researchers, government policy makers, public health officials, health care administrators, payers, businesses, clinicians, patients, and consumers.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 827.45
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 55
Authors
16Topics & keywords
- Comparability
- Medicine
- Cost effectiveness
- Health care
- Government (linguistics)
- Health economics
- Public health
- Quality (philosophy)
Funding
- BUBrown University
- UOUniversity of Miami
- UOUniversity of Pennsylvania
- EUEmory University
- TMTufts Medical Center
- HUHarvard University
- UOUniversity of Washington
- UOUniversity of Pittsburgh
- UOUniversity of Cincinnati
- MUMcMaster University
- SOSchool of Public Health, University of Michigan
- UOUniversity of Glasgow
- TCTrinity College Dublin
- RGRijksuniversiteit Groningen
- BUBen-Gurion University of the Negev
- UIUniversitetet i Oslo
- CFCenters for Disease Control and Prevention
- UOUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- UOUniversity of California, Los Angeles
- MSMedical School, University of Michigan
- LMLeonard M. Miller School of Medicine
- LMLeonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami
- DODepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health