Do “Brain-Training” Programs Work?
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · Florida State University · +7 more institutions
Abstract
In 2014, two groups of scientists published open letters on the efficacy of brain-training interventions, or "brain games," for improving cognition. The first letter, a consensus statement from an international group of more than 70 scientists, claimed that brain games do not provide a scientifically grounded way to improve cognitive functioning or to stave off cognitive decline. Several months later, an international group of 133 scientists and practitioners countered that the literature is replete with demonstrations of the benefits of brain training for a wide variety of cognitive and everyday activities. How could two teams of scientists examine the same literature and come to conflicting "consensus" views…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 137.12
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 334
Authors
7- DJDaniel J. SimonsCorresponding
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
- WRWalter R. Boot
Florida State University
- NCNeil Charness
Florida State University
- SESusan E. Gathercole
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge School, Medical Research Council
- CFChristopher F. Chabris
Union College, Geisinger Health System
Topics & keywords
- Cognition
- Set (abstract data type)
- Psychological intervention
- Psychology
- Best practice
- Intervention (counseling)
- Variety (cybernetics)
- Cognitive training