Collider scope: when selection bias can substantially influence observed associations
MRC Epidemiology Unit · UK Centre for Tobacco & Alcohol Studies · +4 more institutions
Abstract
Large-scale cross-sectional and cohort studies have transformed our understanding of the genetic and environmental determinants of health outcomes. However, the representativeness of these samples may be limited-either through selection into studies, or by attrition from studies over time. Here we explore the potential impact of this selection bias on results obtained from these studies, from the perspective that this amounts to conditioning on a collider (i.e. a form of collider bias). Whereas it is acknowledged that selection bias will have a strong effect on representativeness and prevalence estimates, it is often assumed that it should not have a strong impact on estimates of associations. We argue that…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 44.38
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 41
Authors
5- MRMarcus R. MunafòCorresponding
MRC Epidemiology Unit, UK Centre for Tobacco & Alcohol Studies, MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit
- KTKate Tilling
MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, MRC Epidemiology Unit
- AEAmy E. Taylor
MRC Epidemiology Unit, MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, UK Centre for Tobacco & Alcohol Studies
- DMDavid M. Evans
University of Queensland, MRC Epidemiology Unit, MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Translational Research Institute
- GDGeorge Davey Smith
University of Bristol, MRC Epidemiology Unit, MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit
Topics & keywords
- Collider
- Selection bias
- Selection (genetic algorithm)
- Attrition
- Representativeness heuristic
- Population
- Sampling bias
- Sample size determination
Funding
- WWellcomeAward: 102215/2/13/2
- WTWellcome TrustAwards: 102215/2/13/2, 102215
- UKUnited Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration
- CRCancer Research UKAward: BB/I025263/1
- NINational Institute for Health and Care ResearchAwards: MC_UU_12013/1, BB/I025263/1
- BHBritish Heart Foundation
- UOUniversity of BristolAwards: MC_UU_12013/1, MC_UU_12013/9, MC_UU_12013/8, 102215/2/13/2, MC_UU_12013/4, BB/I025263/1, MC_UU_12013/6, MC_UU_12013/2
- NINational Institutes of HealthAward: 102215/2/13/2
- MRMedical Research CouncilAwards: 102215, MC_UU_00011/7, MC_UU_12013/8, MC_UU_12013, MC_UU_12013/2 and MC_UU_12013/8, MC_UU_12013/4, 102215/2/13/2, MC_UU_12013/1, MC_PC_15018, MC_UU_12013/2, MC_UU_12013/6, MC_UU_12013/9
- BABiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilAwards: BBI025751/1 and BB/I025263/1, BB/I025263/1, BBI025751/1, BB/I025263/1
- EAEconomic and Social Research CouncilAwards: ES/N000498/1, 102215/2/13/2