Improved Automated Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy on a Publicly Available Dataset Through Integration of Deep Learning

University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · University of Iowa · +2 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Methods

We used the previously reported consensus reference standard of referable DR (rDR), defined as International Clinical Classification of Diabetic Retinopathy moderate, severe nonproliferative (NPDR), proliferative DR, and/or macular edema (ME). Neither Messidor-2 images, nor the three retinal specialists setting the Messidor-2 reference standard were used for training IDx-DR version X2.1. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, area under the curve (AUC), and their confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

Results

Sensitivity was 96.8% (95% CI: 93.3%-98.8%), specificity was 87.0% (95% CI: 84.2%-89.4%), with 6/874 false negatives, resulting in a negative predictive value of 99.0% (95% CI: 97.8%-99.6%). No cases of severe NPDR, PDR, or ME were missed. The AUC was 0.980 (95% CI: 0.968-0.992). Sensitivity was not statistically different from published IDP sensitivity, which had a CI of 94.4% to 99.3%, but specificity was significantly better than the published IDP specificity CI of 55.7% to 63.0%.

Citation impact

1,094
total citations
FWCI
55.33
Percentile
100%
References
31
Citations per year

Authors

7

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Diabetic retinopathy
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Fundus (uterus)
  • Deep learning
  • Confidence interval
  • Predictive value
  • Macular edema
No related works found for this paper.