Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update)
The Royal Free Hospital · Roland Hill (United Kingdom) · +1 more institution
Abstract
There is a significant potential for e-health to deliver cost-effective, quality health care, and spending on e-health systems by governments and healthcare systems is increasing worldwide. However, there remains a tension between the use of e-health in this way and implementation. Furthermore, the large body of reviews in the e-health implementation field, often based on one particular technology, setting or health condition make it difficult to access a comprehensive and comprehensible summary of available evidence to help plan and undertake implementation. This review provides an update and re-analysis of a systematic review of the e-health implementation literature culminating in a set of accessible and usable recommendations for anyone involved or interested in the implementation of e-health.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and The Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between 2009 and 2014. Studies were included if they were systematic reviews of the implementation of e-health. Data from included studies were synthesised using the principles of meta-ethnography, and categorisation of the data was informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 91.22
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 64
Authors
4- JRJamie RossCorresponding
The Royal Free Hospital, Roland Hill (United Kingdom), University College London
- FSFiona Stevenson
The Royal Free Hospital, Roland Hill (United Kingdom), University College London
- RLRosa Lau
The Royal Free Hospital, Roland Hill (United Kingdom), University College London
- EMElizabeth Murray
The Royal Free Hospital, Roland Hill (United Kingdom), University College London
Topics & keywords
- CINAHL
- Health care
- Health informatics
- Medicine
- PsycINFO
- Systematic review
- Health services research
- Health administration