The Causes of Errors in Clinical Reasoning: Cognitive Biases, Knowledge Deficits, and Dual Process Thinking
McMaster University · University of Washington · +2 more institutions
Abstract
Contemporary theories of clinical reasoning espouse a dual processing model, which consists of a rapid, intuitive component (Type 1) and a slower, logical and analytical component (Type 2). Although the general consensus is that this dual processing model is a valid representation of clinical reasoning, the causes of diagnostic errors remain unclear. Cognitive theories about human memory propose that such errors may arise from both Type 1 and Type 2 reasoning. Errors in Type 1 reasoning may be a consequence of the associative nature of memory, which can lead to cognitive biases. However, the literature indicates that, with increasing expertise (and knowledge), the likelihood of errors decreases. Errors in Type…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 34.36
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 73
Authors
6Topics & keywords
- Dual process theory (moral psychology)
- Cognitive psychology
- Cognition
- Cognitive bias
- Process (computing)
- Psychology
- Dual (grammatical number)
- Representation (politics)
- Quality Education