STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration
Délégation Paris 5 · Inserm · +13 more institutions
Abstract
Diagnostic accuracy studies are, like other clinical studies, at risk of bias due to shortcomings in design and conduct, and the results of a diagnostic accuracy study may not apply to other patient groups and settings. Readers of study reports need to be informed about study design and conduct, in sufficient detail to judge the trustworthiness and applicability of the study findings. The STARD statement (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) was developed to improve the completeness and transparency of reports of diagnostic accuracy studies. STARD contains a list of essential items that can be used as a checklist, by authors, reviewers and other readers, to ensure that a report of a…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 72.16
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 127
Authors
11- JFJérémie F. Cohen
Délégation Paris 5, Inserm, Université Paris Cité, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, University of Amsterdam
- DADaniël A. Korevaar
University of Amsterdam
- DGDouglas G. Altman
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford
- DEDavid E. Bruns
University of Virginia
- CGConstantine Gatsonis
Brown University
Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Elaboration
- Medical physics