Self-evaluation of decision-making: A general Bayesian framework for metacognitive computation.
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · Princeton University · +3 more institutions
Abstract
People are often aware of their mistakes, and report levels of confidence in their choices that correlate with objective performance. These metacognitive assessments of decision quality are important for the guidance of behavior, particularly when external feedback is absent or sporadic. However, a computational framework that accounts for both confidence and error detection is lacking. In addition, accounts of dissociations between performance and metacognition have often relied on ad hoc assumptions, precluding a unified account of intact and impaired self-evaluation. Here we present a general Bayesian framework in which self-evaluation is cast as a "second-order" inference on a coupled but distinct decision…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 20.85
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 196
Authors
2- SMStephen M. FlemingCorresponding
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Princeton University, University College London, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery
- NDNathaniel D. Daw
Neuroscience Institute, University College London, Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Princeton University, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery
Topics & keywords
- Metacognition
- Bayesian probability
- Computation
- Computer science
- Psychology
- Artificial intelligence
- Bayesian statistics
- Cognitive psychology
- Peace, Justice and strong institutions