Scholars’ open debate paper on the World Health Organization ICD-11 Gaming Disorder proposal
IT University of Copenhagen · Framingham State University · +17 more institutions
Abstract
Concerns about problematic gaming behaviors deserve our full attention. However, we claim that it is far from clear that these problems can or should be attributed to a new disorder. The empirical basis for a Gaming Disorder proposal, such as in the new ICD-11, suffers from fundamental issues. Our main concerns are the low quality of the research base, the fact that the current operationalization leans too heavily on substance use and gambling criteria, and the lack of consensus on symptomatology and assessment of problematic gaming. The act of formalizing this disorder, even as a proposal, has negative medical, scientific, public-health, societal, and human rights fallout that should be considered. Of…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 172.46
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 5
Authors
26Topics & keywords
- Operationalization
- Harm
- Psychology
- Public health
- Stigma (botany)
- Inclusion (mineral)
- Psychiatry
- Social psychology