Balloon Angioplasty versus Implantation of Nitinol Stents in the Superficial Femoral Artery
Abstract
Because stent implantation for disease of the superficial femoral artery has been associated with high rates of late clinical failure, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is preferred for endovascular treatment, and stenting is recommended only in the event of suboptimal technical results. We evaluated whether primary implantation of a self-expanding nitinol (nickel-titanium) stent yielded anatomical and clinical benefits superior to those afforded by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with optional secondary stenting.
We randomly assigned 104 patients who had severe claudication or chronic limb ischemia due to stenosis or occlusion of the superficial femoral artery to undergo primary stent implantation (51 patients) or angioplasty (53 patients). Restenosis and clinical outcomes were assessed at 6 and 12 months.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 61.60
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 24
Authors
10Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Percutaneous
- Angioplasty
- Superficial femoral artery
- Femoral artery
- Balloon
- Stent
- Surgery
- Good health and well-being