articleJAMAJan 17, 2017Closed access

Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit

The Alfred Hospital · University of Adelaide · +5 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Importance

The Sepsis-3 Criteria emphasized the value of a change of 2 or more points in the Sequential [Sepsis-related] Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, introduced quick SOFA (qSOFA), and removed the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria from the sepsis definition.

Objective

Externally validate and assess the discriminatory capacities of an increase in SOFA score by 2 or more points, 2 or more SIRS criteria, or a qSOFA score of 2 or more points for outcomes among patients who are critically ill with suspected infection. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort analysis of 184 875 patients with an infection-related primary admission diagnosis in 182 Australian and New Zealand intensive care units (ICUs) from 2000 through 2015. Exposures: SOFA, qSOFA, and SIRS criteria applied to data collected within 24 hours of ICU admission. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. In-hospital mortality or ICU length of stay (LOS) of 3 days or more was a composite secondary outcome. Discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Adjusted analyses were performed using a model of baseline risk determined using variables independent of the scoring systems.

Citation impact

1,259
total citations
FWCI
75.41
Percentile
100%
References
21
Citations per year

Authors

7

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • SOFA score
  • Systemic inflammatory response syndrome
  • Receiver operating characteristic
  • Intensive care unit
  • Sepsis
  • Retrospective cohort study
  • Pneumonia
No related works found for this paper.