articleAnnals of SurgeryFeb 10, 2017GREEN OA

Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophageal Resection

Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · Hospital Universitari de Girona Doctor Josep Trueta · +4 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate 3-year survival following a randomized controlled trial comparing minimally invasive with open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer.

Background

Research on minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has shown faster postoperative recovery and a marked decrease in pulmonary complications. Debate is ongoing as to whether the procedure is equivalent to open resection regarding oncologic outcomes. The study is a follow-up study of the TIME-trial (traditional invasive vs minimally invasive esophagectomy, a multicenter, randomized trial).

Citation impact

550
total citations
FWCI
48.62
Percentile
100%
References
19
Citations per year

Authors

10

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Esophagectomy
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Surgery
  • Hazard ratio
  • Esophageal cancer
  • Survival rate
  • Neoadjuvant therapy
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.