reviewBMC BiologyMar 3, 2017GOLD OA

Meta-evaluation of meta-analysis: ten appraisal questions for biologists

UNSW Sydney · University of Sydney

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Meta-analysis is a statistical procedure for analyzing the combined data from different studies, and can be a major source of concise up-to-date information. The overall conclusions of a meta-analysis, however, depend heavily on the quality of the meta-analytic process, and an appropriate evaluation of the quality of meta-analysis (meta-evaluation) can be challenging. We outline ten questions biologists can ask to critically appraise a meta-analysis. These questions could also act as simple and accessible guidelines for the authors of meta-analyses. We focus on meta-analyses using non-human species, which we term 'biological' meta-analysis. Our ten questions are aimed at enabling a biologist to evaluate…

Citation impact

550
total citations
FWCI
36.46
Percentile
100%
References
111
Citations per year

Authors

4

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Meta-analysis
  • Mistake
  • Biology
  • Data science
  • Quality (philosophy)
  • Computer science
  • Epistemology
No related works found for this paper.

Funding