reviewBMJ OpenFeb 1, 2017GOLD OA

Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry

University of Alabama at Birmingham · Energetics (United States)

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Objectives

To summarise logistical aspects of recently completed systematic reviews that were registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registry to quantify the time and resources required to complete such projects.

Design

Meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: All of the 195 registered and completed reviews (status from the PROSPERO registry) with associated publications at the time of our search (1 July 2014). DATA EXTRACTION: All authors extracted data using registry entries and publication information related to the data sources used, the number of initially retrieved citations, the final number of included studies, the time between registration date to publication date and number of authors involved for completion of each publication. Information related to funding and geographical location was also recorded when reported.

No related works found for this paper.

Funding