Zero-Shot Learning — The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Max Planck Institute for Informatics · University of Amsterdam
Abstract
Due to the importance of zero-shot learning, the number of proposed approaches has increased steadily recently. We argue that it is time to take a step back and to analyze the status quo of the area. The purpose of this paper is three-fold. First, given the fact that there is no agreed upon zero-shot learning benchmark, we first define a new benchmark by unifying both the evaluation protocols and data splits. This is an important contribution as published results are often not comparable and sometimes even flawed due to, e.g. pre-training on zero-shot test classes. Second, we compare and analyze a significant number of the state-of-the-art methods in depth, both in the classic zero-shot setting but also in the…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 227.85
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 59
Authors
3Topics & keywords
- Zero (linguistics)
- Shot (pellet)
- Computer science
- Materials science
- Philosophy
- Linguistics