reviewBMJ OpenMar 1, 2017GOLD OA

Recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials funded and published by the United Kingdom Health Technology Assessment Programme

University of Sheffield

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Background

Substantial amounts of public funds are invested in health research worldwide. Publicly funded randomised controlled trials (RCTs) often recruit participants at a slower than anticipated rate. Many trials fail to reach their planned sample size within the envisaged trial timescale and trial funding envelope.

Objectives

To review the consent, recruitment and retention rates for single and multicentre randomised control trials funded and published by the UK's National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: HTA reports of individually randomised single or multicentre RCTs published from the start of 2004 to the end of April 2016 were reviewed. DATA EXTRACTION: Information was extracted, relating to the trial characteristics, sample size, recruitment and retention by two independent reviewers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Target sample size and whether it was achieved; recruitment rates (number of participants recruited per centre per month) and retention rates (randomised participants retained and assessed with valid primary outcome data).

Citation impact

594
total citations
FWCI
39.27
Percentile
100%
References
55
Citations per year

Authors

11

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Alternative medicine
  • Family medicine
  • Clinical trial
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • MEDLINE
  • Gerontology
  • Internal medicine
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Partnerships for the goals
No related works found for this paper.

Funding