reviewBMJ OpenApr 1, 2017GOLD OA

Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence

University of York · University of Manchester · +1 more institution

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Objectives

Social prescribing is a way of linking patients in primary care with sources of support within the community to help improve their health and well-being. Social prescribing programmes are being widely promoted and adopted in the UK National Health Service and so we conducted a systematic review to assess the evidence for their effectiveness. SETTING/DATA SOURCES: Nine databases were searched from 2000 to January 2016 for studies conducted in the UK. Relevant reports and guidelines, websites and reference lists of retrieved articles were scanned to identify additional studies. All the searches were restricted to English language only.

Participants

Systematic reviews and any published evaluation of programmes where patient referral was made from a primary care setting to a link worker or facilitator of social prescribing were eligible for inclusion. Risk of bias for included studies was undertaken independently by two reviewers and a narrative synthesis was performed. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes of interest were any measures of health and well-being and/or usage of health services.

Citation impact

761
total citations
FWCI
461.73
Percentile
100%
References
20
Citations per year

Authors

5

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Rhetoric
  • Public health
  • Alternative medicine
  • Engineering ethics
  • Nursing
  • Pathology
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Reduced inequalities
No related works found for this paper.

Funding