Psychology's Renaissance
University of California, Berkeley · University of Pennsylvania
Abstract
In 2010-2012, a few largely coincidental events led experimental psychologists to realize that their approach to collecting, analyzing, and reporting data made it too easy to publish false-positive findings. This sparked a period of methodological reflection that we review here and call Psychology's Renaissance. We begin by describing how psychologists' concerns with publication bias shifted from worrying about file-drawered studies to worrying about p-hacked analyses. We then review the methodological changes that psychologists have proposed and, in some cases, embraced. In describing how the renaissance has unfolded, we attempt to describe different points of view fairly but not neutrally, so as to identify…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 49.65
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 115
Authors
3Topics & keywords
- Psychology
- The Renaissance
- Skepticism
- Publication
- Interpretation (philosophy)
- Champion
- Confirmation bias
- Replication (statistics)