reviewAnnual Review of PsychologyOct 25, 2017Closed access

Psychology's Renaissance

University of California, Berkeley · University of Pennsylvania

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

In 2010-2012, a few largely coincidental events led experimental psychologists to realize that their approach to collecting, analyzing, and reporting data made it too easy to publish false-positive findings. This sparked a period of methodological reflection that we review here and call Psychology's Renaissance. We begin by describing how psychologists' concerns with publication bias shifted from worrying about file-drawered studies to worrying about p-hacked analyses. We then review the methodological changes that psychologists have proposed and, in some cases, embraced. In describing how the renaissance has unfolded, we attempt to describe different points of view fairly but not neutrally, so as to identify…

Citation impact

587
total citations
FWCI
49.65
Percentile
100%
References
115
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Psychology
  • The Renaissance
  • Skepticism
  • Publication
  • Interpretation (philosophy)
  • Champion
  • Confirmation bias
  • Replication (statistics)
No related works found for this paper.