reviewMedical EducationMay 9, 2017Closed access

A systematic review of the effectiveness of flipped classrooms in medical education

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · Albany State University · +1 more institution

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Methods

A literature search was conducted using the major electronic databases in 2016. Peer-reviewed papers were screened and reviewed according to explicit inclusion criteria. The scope and quality of all resultant studies were evaluated. Studies identified as using controlled designs were further synthesised to assess the effects of FCs on learning.

Results

A total of 118 articles were obtained. Full texts of 82 articles were reviewed. Nine of the included 46 articles used a controlled design when examining the effects of the FC. There were generally positive perceptions of the FC approach. However, the effects of FCs on changes in knowledge and skills were less conclusive as the effect sizes ranged from d = -0.27 to 1.21, with a median of 0.08. The varying direction and magnitude of the effect sizes, together with their 95% confidence interval, which contained zero, suggested the lack of strong evidence for the effectiveness of FCs in promoting knowledge acquisition above and beyond the traditional learning methods.

Citation impact

741
total citations
FWCI
261.50
Percentile
100%
References
46
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Scope (computer science)
  • Flipped classroom
  • Inclusion (mineral)
  • Variety (cybernetics)
  • Medical education
  • Quality (philosophy)
  • Medicine
  • Evidence-based medicine
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Quality Education
No related works found for this paper.