Droplet Digital PCR versus qPCR for gene expression analysis with low abundant targets: from variable nonsense to publication quality data
Bio-Rad (United States) · Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Abstract
Quantitative PCR (qPCR) has become the gold standard technique to measure cDNA and gDNA levels but the resulting data can be highly variable, artifactual and non-reproducible without appropriate verification and validation of both samples and primers. The root cause of poor quality data is typically associated with inadequate dilution of residual protein and chemical contaminants that variably inhibit Taq polymerase and primer annealing. The most susceptible, frustrating and often most interesting samples are those containing low abundant targets with small expression differences of 2-fold or lower. Here, Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR) and qPCR platforms were directly compared for gene expression analysis using…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 16.93
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 25
Authors
3Topics & keywords
- Digital polymerase chain reaction
- Computational biology
- Nucleic acid
- Primer (cosmetics)
- Polymerase chain reaction
- Gene expression
- Biology
- Real-time polymerase chain reaction