Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) – Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome

OBon behalf of SBRN Terminology Consensus Project ParticipantsMSMark S. TremblaySASalomé AubertJDJoel D. BarnesTJTravis J. Saunders

Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario · University of Prince Edward Island · +5 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Background

The prominence of sedentary behavior research in health science has grown rapidly. With this growth there is increasing urgency for clear, common and accepted terminology and definitions. Such standardization is difficult to achieve, especially across multi-disciplinary researchers, practitioners, and industries. The Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) undertook a Terminology Consensus Project to address this need. METHOD: First, a literature review was completed to identify key terms in sedentary behavior research. These key terms were then reviewed and modified by a Steering Committee formed by SBRN. Next, SBRN members were invited to contribute to this project and interested participants reviewed and provided feedback on the proposed list of terms and draft definitions through an online survey. Finally, a conceptual model and consensus definitions (including caveats and examples for all age groups and functional abilities) were finalized based on the feedback received from the 87 SBRN member participants who responded to the original invitation and survey.

Results

Consensus definitions for the terms physical inactivity, stationary behavior, sedentary behavior, standing, screen time, non-screen-based sedentary time, sitting, reclining, lying, sedentary behavior pattern, as well as how the terms bouts, breaks, and interruptions should be used in this context are provided.

Citation impact

3,725
total citations
FWCI
169.52
Percentile
100%
References
81
Citations per year

Authors

10

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Terminology
  • Behavioural sciences
  • Context (archaeology)
  • Sedentary behavior
  • Standardization
  • Process (computing)
  • Psychology
  • Applied psychology
No related works found for this paper.

Funding