Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases
University of Oslo · Oslo University Hospital · +2 more institutions
Abstract
To perform the first randomized controlled trial to compare laparoscopic and open liver resection. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Laparoscopic liver resection is increasingly used for the surgical treatment of liver tumors. However, high-level evidence to conclude that laparoscopic liver resection is superior to open liver resection is lacking.
Explanatory, assessor-blinded, single center, randomized superiority trial recruiting patients from Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway from February 2012 to January 2016. A total of 280 patients with resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to undergo laparoscopic (n = 133) or open (n = 147) parenchyma-sparing liver resection. The primary outcome was postoperative complications within 30 days (Accordion grade 2 or higher). Secondary outcomes included cost-effectiveness, postoperative hospital stay, blood loss, operation time, and resection margins.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 34.83
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 44
Authors
17- ÅAÅsmund Avdem FretlandCorresponding
University of Oslo, Oslo University Hospital
- VJVegar Johansen Dagenborg
University of Oslo, Oslo University Hospital
- GMGudrun Maria Waaler BjørnelvCorresponding
Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo
- AМAirazat М. KazaryanCorresponding
Akershus University Hospital
- RKRonny KristiansenCorresponding
Oslo University Hospital
Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Surgery
- Randomized controlled trial
- Laparoscopic surgery
- Laparoscopy
- Colorectal cancer
- Confidence interval
- Hepatectomy
- Good health and well-being