Follow-up of Prostatectomy versus Observation for Early Prostate Cancer
University of Minnesota · Department of Veterans Affairs · +7 more institutions
Abstract
We previously found no significant differences in mortality between men who underwent surgery for localized prostate cancer and those who were treated with observation only. Uncertainty persists regarding nonfatal health outcomes and long-term mortality.
From November 1994 through January 2002, we randomly assigned 731 men with localized prostate cancer to radical prostatectomy or observation. We extended follow-up through August 2014 for our primary outcome, all-cause mortality, and the main secondary outcome, prostate-cancer mortality. We describe disease progression, treatments received, and patient-reported outcomes through January 2010 (original follow-up).
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 59.48
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 32
Authors
8- TJTimothy J WiltCorresponding
University of Minnesota, Department of Veterans Affairs
- KJKaren Jones
Program Support Center, Department of Veterans Affairs
- MJMichael J. Barry
Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Veterans Affairs
- GLGerald L. Andriole
Washington University in St. Louis, Department of Veterans Affairs
- DJDaniel J. Culkin
Department of Veterans Affairs, University of Oklahoma
Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Prostate cancer
- Prostatectomy
- Hazard ratio
- Confidence interval
- Absolute risk reduction
- Relative risk
- Internal medicine
- Good health and well-being