reviewInternational Journal of Geriatric PsychiatryJul 21, 2017Closed access

A re‐examination of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) cutoff scores

York University · Columbia College of Nursing · +2 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Objective

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA; Nasreddine et al., 2005) is a cognitive screening tool that aims to differentiate healthy cognitive aging from Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). Several validation studies have been conducted on the MoCA, in a variety of clinical populations. Some studies have indicated that the originally suggested cutoff score of 26/30 leads to an inflated rate of false positives, particularly for those of older age and/or lower education. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the MoCA for differentiating healthy cognitive aging from possible MCI.

Methods

Of the 304 studies identified, nine met inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. These studies were assessed across a range of cutoff scores to determine the respective sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative predictive accuracies, likelihood ratios for positive and negative results, classification accuracies, and Youden indices.

Citation impact

921
total citations
FWCI
37.43
Percentile
100%
References
82
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment
  • Cutoff
  • Cognition
  • False positive paradox
  • Meta-analysis
  • Youden's J statistic
  • Medicine
  • Psychology
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Quality Education
No related works found for this paper.