reviewThe Lancet Global HealthAug 3, 2017GOLD OA

Magnitude, temporal trends, and projections of the global prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Anglia Ruskin University · University of Oxford · +23 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Background

Global and regional prevalence estimates for blindness and vision impairment are important for the development of public health policies. We aimed to provide global estimates, trends, and projections of global blindness and vision impairment.

Methods

We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based datasets relevant to global vision impairment and blindness that were published between 1980 and 2015. We fitted hierarchical models to estimate the prevalence (by age, country, and sex), in 2015, of mild visual impairment (presenting visual acuity worse than 6/12 to 6/18 inclusive), moderate to severe visual impairment (presenting visual acuity worse than 6/18 to 3/60 inclusive), blindness (presenting visual acuity worse than 3/60), and functional presbyopia (defined as presenting near vision worse than N6 or N8 at 40 cm when best-corrected distance visual acuity was better than 6/12).

Citation impact

2,218
total citations
FWCI
152.72
Percentile
100%
References
31
Citations per year

Authors

115

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Visual impairment
  • Visual acuity
  • Presbyopia
  • Medicine
  • Meta-analysis
  • Blindness
  • Population
  • Optometry
No related works found for this paper.

Funding