Power analysis for random‐effects meta‐analysis
Indexed incrossrefdatacitepubmed
Abstract
One of the reasons for the popularity of meta-analysis is the notion that these analyses will possess more power to detect effects than individual studies. This is inevitably the case under a fixed-effect model. However, the inclusion of the between-study variance in the random-effects model, and the need to estimate this parameter, can have unfortunate implications for this power. We develop methods for assessing the power of random-effects meta-analyses, and the average power of the individual studies that contribute to meta-analyses, so that these powers can be compared. In addition to deriving new analytical results and methods, we apply our methods to 1991 meta-analyses taken from the Cochrane Database of…
Citation impact
611
total citations
- FWCI
- 28.41
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 36
Citations per year
Authors
2Topics & keywords
Keywords
- Meta-analysis
- Random effects model
- Computer science
- Statistical power
- Inference
- Popularity
- Power analysis
- Variance (accounting)
UN Sustainable Development Goals
- Reduced inequalities
No related works found for this paper.