reviewThe Journal of Strength and Conditioning ResearchAug 23, 2017Closed access

Strength and Hypertrophy Adaptations Between Low- vs. High-Load Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Lehman College · Victoria University · +1 more institution

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Schoenfeld, BJ, Grgic, J, Ogborn, D, and Krieger, JW. Strength and hypertrophy adaptations between low- vs. high-load resistance training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 31(12): 3508-3523, 2017-The purpose of this article was to conduct a systematic review of the current body of literature and a meta-analysis to compare changes in strength and hypertrophy between low- vs. high-load resistance training protocols. Searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were conducted for studies that met the following criteria: (a) an experimental trial involving both low-load training [≤60% 1 repetition maximum (1RM)] and high-load training (>60% 1RM); (b) with all sets in the…

Citation impact

809
total citations
FWCI
40.17
Percentile
100%
References
60
Citations per year

Authors

4

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Isometric exercise
  • Muscle hypertrophy
  • Resistance training
  • Cochrane Library
  • Meta-analysis
  • Strength training
  • Medicine
  • Muscle strength
No related works found for this paper.