articleScience CommunicationSep 14, 2017Closed access

Using Expert Sources to Correct Health Misinformation in Social Media

George Mason University · Georgetown University

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

This study tests whether the number (1 vs. 2) and the source (another user vs. the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]) of corrective responses affect successful reduction of misperceptions. Using an experimental design, our results suggest that while a single correction from another user did not reduce misperceptions, the CDC on its own could correct misinformation. Corrections were more effective among those higher in initial misperceptions. Notably, organizational credibility was not reduced when correcting misinformation, making this a low-cost behavior for public health organizations. We recommend that expert organizations like the CDC immediately and personally rebut misinformation about…

Citation impact

543
total citations
FWCI
81.95
Percentile
100%
References
65
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Misinformation
  • Credibility
  • Social media
  • Affect (linguistics)
  • Control (management)
  • Psychology
  • Source credibility
  • Social psychology
No related works found for this paper.