articleNew England Journal of MedicineNov 8, 2017BRONZE OA

Mechanical or Biologic Prostheses for Aortic-Valve and Mitral-Valve Replacement

Stanford University

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

In patients undergoing aortic-valve or mitral-valve replacement, either a mechanical or biologic prosthesis is used. Biologic prostheses have been increasingly favored despite limited evidence supporting this practice.

Methods

We compared long-term mortality and rates of reoperation, stroke, and bleeding between inverse-probability-weighted cohorts of patients who underwent primary aortic-valve replacement or mitral-valve replacement with a mechanical or biologic prosthesis in California in the period from 1996 through 2013. Patients were stratified into different age groups on the basis of valve position (aortic vs. mitral valve).

Citation impact

661
total citations
FWCI
35.02
Percentile
100%
References
28
Citations per year

Authors

7

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Prosthesis
  • Hazard ratio
  • Cardiology
  • Mitral valve replacement
  • Internal medicine
  • Aortic valve replacement
  • Mitral valve
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.

Funding