articleAnnals of Internal MedicineOct 16, 2007Closed access

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration

JPJan P. VandenbrouckeEVErik von ElmDGDouglas G. AltmanPCPeter C. GøtzscheCDCynthia D. Mulrow

UPMC Hillman Cancer Center · Rigshospitalet · +11 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalizability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) recommendations to improve the quality of reporting of observational studies. The STROBE Statement consists of a checklist of 22 items, which relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common…

Citation impact

3,503
total citations
FWCI
85.48
Percentile
100%
References
227
Citations per year

Authors

10

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology
  • Observational study
  • Checklist
  • Generalizability theory
  • Critical appraisal
  • Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials
  • Medicine
  • Quality (philosophy)
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.