Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance
University of Stirling · Edinburgh Napier University · +13 more institutions
Abstract
The aim of this study was to provide guidance to improve the completeness and clarity of meta-ethnography reporting.
Evidence-based policy and practice require robust evidence syntheses which can further understanding of people's experiences and associated social processes. Meta-ethnography is a rigorous seven-phase qualitative evidence synthesis methodology, developed by Noblit and Hare. Meta-ethnography is used widely in health research, but reporting is often poor quality and this discourages trust in and use of its findings. Meta-ethnography reporting guidance is needed to improve reporting quality.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 32.10
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 64
Authors
22- EFEmma F. FranceCorresponding
University of Stirling
- MCMaggie Cunningham
University of Stirling
- NRNicola Ring
Edinburgh Napier University
- IUIsabelle Uny
University of Stirling
- EDEdward Duncan
University of Stirling
Topics & keywords
- CLARITY
- Ethnography
- Audit
- Bespoke
- Best practice
- Medical education
- Medicine
- Psychology
Funding
- MUMcMaster University
- WTWellcome TrustAward: WT087640MA
- UKUnited Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration
- CRCancer Research UK
- NINational Institute for Health and Care ResearchAward: 13/114/60
- BHBritish Heart Foundation
- UOUniversity of Southampton
- UOUniversity of Nottingham
- SASouth African Medical Research Council
- UOUniversity of Stirling
- UOUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- MRMedical Research CouncilAwards: WT087640MA, MR/K023233/1
- EAEconomic and Social Research CouncilAward: RES-590-28-0005
- NINorwegian Institute of Public Health