Bone grafts: which is the ideal biomaterial?
University of Oslo · Vitenparken · +5 more institutions
Abstract
Within this narrative review, we discuss possible future biomaterials for bone replacement. SCIENTIFIC RATIONALE FOR STUDY: Although the bone graft (BG) literature is overflooded, only a handful of new BG substitutes are clinically available. Laboratory studies tend to focus on advanced production methods and novel biomaterial features, which can be costly to produce. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: In this review, we ask why such a limited number of BGs are clinically available when compared to extensive laboratory studies. We also discuss what features are needed for an ideal BG.
We have identified the key properties of current bone substitutes and have provided important information to guide clinical decision-making and generate new perspectives on bone substitutes. Our results indicated that different mechanical and biological properties are needed despite each having a broad spectrum of variations.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 22.12
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 120
Authors
4- HJHåvard Jostein HaugenCorresponding
University of Oslo
- SPStåle Petter Lyngstadaas
University of Oslo, Vitenparken, Corticalis (Norway)
- FRFilippo Rossi
Politecnico di Milano
- GPGiuseppe Perale
University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Vir Biotechnology (Switzerland), Ospedale Policlinico San Martino
Topics & keywords
- Biomaterial
- Narrative review
- Computer science
- Medicine
- Dentistry
- Risk analysis (engineering)
- Intensive care medicine
- Biomedical engineering