Standards for distribution models in biodiversity assessments
University of Copenhagen · Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · +21 more institutions
Abstract
Demand for models in biodiversity assessments is rising, but which models are adequate for the task? We propose a set of best-practice standards and detailed guidelines enabling scoring of studies based on species distribution models for use in biodiversity assessments. We reviewed and scored 400 modeling studies over the past 20 years using the proposed standards and guidelines. We detected low model adequacy overall, but with a marked tendency of improvement over time in model building and, to a lesser degree, in biological data and model evaluation. We argue that implementation of agreed-upon standards for models in biodiversity assessments would promote transparency and repeatability, eventually leading to…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 88.02
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 167
Authors
13- MBMiguel B. AraújoCorresponding
University of Copenhagen, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, University of Évora, Natural History Museum Aarhus, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales
- RPRobert P. Anderson
The Graduate Center, CUNY, City College of New York, American Museum of Natural History, City University of New York
- AMA. Márcia Barbosa
University of Évora
- CMColin M. Beale
University of York
- CFCarsten F. Dormann
University of Freiburg
Topics & keywords
- Biodiversity
- Variety (cybernetics)
- Distribution (mathematics)
- Environmental resource management
- Computer science
- Data science
- Environmental science
- Ecology
- Life in Land
Funding
- NSNational Science FoundationAwards: DEB-1119915, 1119915
- ECEuropean CommissionAward: ES1101
- NRNational Research FoundationAward: DNRF96
- SNSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungAwards: 310030L-170059, CR23I2_162754, 310030L, 31003A, 170059, 152866
- DGDanmarks GrundforskningsfondAward: DNRF96
- CFCenter for Makroøkologi, Evolution og KlimaAward: DNRF96