Oral versus Intravenous Antibiotics for Bone and Joint Infection
MACOM (United States) · University of Oxford · +28 more institutions
Abstract
The management of complex orthopedic infections usually includes a prolonged course of intravenous antibiotic agents. We investigated whether oral antibiotic therapy is noninferior to intravenous antibiotic therapy for this indication.
We enrolled adults who were being treated for bone or joint infection at 26 U.K. centers. Within 7 days after surgery (or, if the infection was being managed without surgery, within 7 days after the start of antibiotic treatment), participants were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous or oral antibiotics to complete the first 6 weeks of therapy. Follow-on oral antibiotics were permitted in both groups. The primary end point was definitive treatment failure within 1 year after randomization. In the analysis of the risk of the primary end point, the noninferiority margin was 7.5 percentage points.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 90.82
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 31
Authors
59- HKHo Kwong LiCorresponding
MACOM (United States), University of Oxford, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Imperial College London
- IRInes Rombach
MACOM (United States), Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre
- RZRhea Zambellas
MACOM (United States), Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre
- ASA. Sarah Walker
MACOM (United States), University College London, Medical Research Council
- MMMartin McNally
MACOM (United States), Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
Topics & keywords
- Antibiotics
- Medicine
- Intravenous therapy
- Intravenous antibiotics
- Joint infections
- Orthopedic surgery
- Antibiotic therapy
- Intensive care medicine
- Good health and well-being