articleAJOB Empirical BioethicsApr 3, 2019Closed access

Enhancing Understanding of Moral Distress: The Measure of Moral Distress for Health Care Professionals

University of Virginia · Carilion Roanoke Memorial Hospital · +2 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

As ongoing research explores the impact of moral distress on health care professionals (HCPs) and organizations and seeks to develop effective interventions, valid and reliable instruments to measure moral distress are needed. This article describes the development and testing of a revision of the widely used Moral Distress Scale-Revised (MDS-R) to measure moral distress.

Methods

We revised the MDS-R by evaluating the combined data from 22 previous studies, assessing 301 write-in items and 209 root causes identified through moral distress consultation, and reviewing 14 recent publications from various professions in which root causes were described. The revised 27-item scale, the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP), is usable by all HCPs in adult and pediatric critical, acute, or long-term acute care settings. We then assessed the reliability of the MMD-HP and evaluated construct validity via hypothesis testing. The MMD-HP, Hospital Ethical Climate Survey (HECS), and a demographic survey were distributed electronically via Qualtrics to nurses, physicians, and other health care professionals at two academic medical centers over a 3-week period.

Citation impact

552
total citations
FWCI
88.55
Percentile
100%
References
51
Citations per year

Authors

5

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Distress
  • Psychological intervention
  • Scale (ratio)
  • Health care
  • Construct validity
  • Psychology
  • Construct (python library)
  • Medicine
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Climate action
No related works found for this paper.

Funding