Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: an updated meta-analysis
University of Bern · University Hospital of Bern · +9 more institutions
Abstract
AIMS: Owing to new evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis, we compared the collective safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) vs. surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) across the entire spectrum of surgical risk patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42016037273). We identified RCTs comparing TAVI with SAVR in patients with severe aortic stenosis reporting at different follow-up periods. We extracted trial, patient, intervention, and outcome characteristics following predefined criteria. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality up to 2 years for the main analysis. Seven…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 39.60
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 38
Authors
14- GCGeorge C.M. Siontis
University of Bern, University Hospital of Bern
- POPavel Overtchouk
University of Bern, University Hospital of Bern
- TJThomas J. Cahill
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
- TMThomas Modine
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Lille’s Cardiology Hospital
- BPBernard Prendergast
St Thomas' Hospital
Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Stenosis
- Aortic valve replacement
- Cardiology
- Aortic valve
- Aortic valve stenosis
- Internal medicine
- Surgery
- Good health and well-being