A systematic review of quality of life research in medicine and health sciences
University of Agder · University of Oslo · +10 more institutions
Abstract
A systematic review was conducted to identify research studies on QOL and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The databases Scopus, which includes Embase and MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched for articles published during one random week in November 2016. The ten predefined criteria of Gill and Feinstein were used to evaluate the conceptual and methodological rigor.
QOL research is international and involves a variety of target groups, research designs, and QOL measures. According to the criteria of Gill and Feinstein, the results show that only 13% provided a definition of QOL, 6% distinguished QOL from HRQOL. The most frequently fulfilled criteria were: (i) stating the domains of QOL to be measured; (ii) giving a reason for choosing the instruments used; and (iii) aggregating the results from multiple items.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 25.03
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 25
Authors
25- TLthe LIVSFORSK networkCorresponding
University of Agder
- KHKristin Haraldstad
University of Oslo, University of Agder
- AKAstrid Klopstad Wahl
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University, University of Oslo
- RARandi Andenæs
Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University, Universidad Metropolitana
- JRJohn Roger Andersen
Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, University of Oslo
Topics & keywords
- CINAHL
- PsycINFO
- Quality of life (healthcare)
- MEDLINE
- Scopus
- CLARITY
- Medicine
- Alternative medicine