Psychological Science Needs a Standard Practice of Reporting the Reliability of Cognitive-Behavioral Measurements
University of Oxford · Stockholm University
Abstract
Psychological science relies on behavioral measures to assess cognitive processing; however, the field has not yet developed a tradition of routinely examining the reliability of these behavioral measures. Reliable measures are essential to draw robust inferences from statistical analyses, and subpar reliability has severe implications for measures’ validity and interpretation. Without examining and reporting the reliability of measurements used in an analysis, it is nearly impossible to ascertain whether results are robust or have arisen largely from measurement error. In this article, we propose that researchers adopt a standard practice of estimating and reporting the reliability of behavioral assessments…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 44.59
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 73
Authors
3Topics & keywords
- Reliability (semiconductor)
- Interpretability
- Cognition
- Psychology
- Intraclass correlation
- Applied psychology
- Field (mathematics)
- Psychometrics
- Quality Education