articleJAMA OncologyAug 16, 2019BRONZE OA

Disparity of Race Reporting and Representation in Clinical Trials Leading to Cancer Drug Approvals From 2008 to 2018

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · Fred Hutch Cancer Center · +2 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Importance

Representative racial/ethnic participation in research, especially in clinical trials that establish standards of care, is necessary to minimize disparities in outcomes and to uphold societal equity in health care.

Objective

To evaluate the frequency of race reporting and proportional race representation in trials supporting US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) oncology drug approvals. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Database study of all reported trials supporting FDA oncology drug approvals granted between July 2008 and June 2018. Primary reports of trials were obtained from PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov. Food and Drug Administration approvals were identified using the FDA archives. The US population-based cancer estimates by race were calculated using National Cancer Institute-Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and US Census databases. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcomes were the proportion of trials reporting race and the proportion of patients by race participating in trials. Secondary outcomes included race subgroup analyses reporting and gaps between race proportion in trials and the US population. Descriptive statistics, Fisher exact, and χ2 tests were used to analyze the data. Proportions and odds ratios (OR) with 95% CIs were reported.

Citation impact

566
total citations
FWCI
58.30
Percentile
100%
References
33
Citations per year

Authors

10

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Clinical trial
  • Population
  • Ethnic group
  • Health equity
  • Family medicine
  • Subgroup analysis
  • Demography
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.