Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes
German Centre for Cardiovascular Research
Abstract
The relative merits of ticagrelor as compared with prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes for whom invasive evaluation is planned are uncertain.
In this multicenter, randomized, open-label trial, we randomly assigned patients who presented with acute coronary syndromes and for whom invasive evaluation was planned to receive either ticagrelor or prasugrel. The primary end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 1 year. A major secondary end point (the safety end point) was bleeding.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 81.50
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 20
Authors
42- SSStefanie SchüpkeCorresponding
German Centre for Cardiovascular Research
- FNFranz‐Josef Neumann
German Centre for Cardiovascular Research
- MMMaurizio Menichelli
German Centre for Cardiovascular Research
- KMKatharina Mayer
German Centre for Cardiovascular Research
- IBIsabell Bernlochner
German Centre for Cardiovascular Research
Topics & keywords
- Prasugrel
- Ticagrelor
- Medicine
- Myocardial infarction
- Internal medicine
- Hazard ratio
- Clinical endpoint
- Cardiology
- Good health and well-being
Funding
- AAmgen
- BSBristol-Myers Squibb
- ELEli Lilly and Company
- PPfizer
- AAstraZeneca
- GGlaxoSmithKline
- SSanofi
- GSGilead Sciences
- ELEdwards Lifesciences
- CBCSL Behring
- BSBoston Scientific Corporation
- OMOsprey Medical
- BHBayer HealthCare
- EKElse Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung
- EEisai
- NNNovo Nordisk
- SServier
- IPIdorsia Pharmaceuticals
- SJSt. Jude Medical
- AVAbbott Vascular
- BVBayer Vital
- DSDaiichi Sankyo Europe