Methodological quality of case series studies

University of Adelaide · George Institute for Global Health · +1 more institution

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Introduction

Systematic reviews provide a rigorous synthesis of the best available evidence regarding a certain question. Where high-quality evidence is lacking, systematic reviewers may choose to rely on case series studies to provide information in relation to their question. However, to date there has been limited guidance on how to incorporate case series studies within systematic reviews assessing the effectiveness of an intervention, particularly with reference to assessing the methodological quality or risk of bias of these studies.

Methods

An international working group was formed to review the methodological literature regarding case series as a form of evidence for inclusion in systematic reviews. The group then developed a critical appraisal tool based on the epidemiological literature relating to bias within these studies. This was then piloted, reviewed, and approved by JBI's international Scientific Committee.

Citation impact

1,342
total citations
FWCI
39.84
Percentile
100%
References
33
Citations per year

Authors

8

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Critical appraisal
  • Systematic review
  • Publication bias
  • Information bias
  • Quality (philosophy)
  • Confounding
  • Evidence-based practice
  • Management science
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Reduced inequalities
No related works found for this paper.