articleBMJOct 23, 2019BRONZE OA

Alternative approaches for confounding adjustment in observational studies using weighting based on the propensity score: a primer for practitioners

Brigham and Women's Hospital · Harvard University

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

This report aims to provide methodological guidance to help practitioners select the most appropriate weighting method based on propensity scores for their analysis out of many available options (eg, inverse probability treatment weights, standardised mortality ratio weights, fine stratification weights, overlap weights, and matching weights), and outlines recommendations for transparent reporting of studies using weighting based on the propensity scores.

Citation impact

647
total citations
FWCI
55.33
Percentile
100%
References
34
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Propensity score matching
  • Weighting
  • Observational study
  • Confounding
  • Matching (statistics)
  • Statistics
  • Inverse probability
  • Inverse probability weighting
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.

Funding