articleJournal of Clinical EpidemiologyNov 8, 2019HYBRID OA

GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions

Impact · Cochrane · +16 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Objectives

Clear communication of systematic review findings will help readers and decision makers. We built on previous work to develop an approach that improves the clarity of statements to convey findings and that draws on Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted workshops including 80 attendants and a survey of 110 producers and users of systematic reviews. We calculated acceptability of statements and revised the wording of those that were unacceptable to ≥40% of participants.

Results

Most participants agreed statements should be based on size of effect and certainty of evidence. Statements for low, moderate and high certainty evidence were acceptable to >60%. Key guidance, for example, includes statements for high, moderate and low certainty for a large effect on intervention x as: x results in a large reduction…; x likely results in a large reduction…; x may result in a large reduction…, respectively.

Citation impact

1,177
total citations
FWCI
52.42
Percentile
100%
References
30
Citations per year

Authors

19

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Grading (engineering)
  • Certainty
  • CLARITY
  • Systematic review
  • Psychological intervention
  • Medicine
  • Psychology
  • Medical education
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Peace, Justice and strong institutions
No related works found for this paper.