The Magic of Randomization versus the Myth of Real-World Evidence
Indexed incrossrefpubmed
Abstract
Nonrandomized observational analyses have been promoted as alternatives to randomized clinical trials. However, randomization ensures balance between groups, whereas nonrandomized studies are often biased by between-group differences. Efforts to reduce the cost and complexity of clinical trials are preferable to relying on observational studies.
Citation impact
471
total citations
- FWCI
- 69.55
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 33
Citations per year
Authors
4Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Observational study
- Medicine
- Randomization
- Randomized controlled trial
- Clinical trial
- MAGIC (telescope)
- Surgery
- Internal medicine
No related works found for this paper.