articleNew England Journal of MedicineFeb 12, 2020Closed access

The Magic of Randomization versus the Myth of Real-World Evidence

University of Oxford

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Nonrandomized observational analyses have been promoted as alternatives to randomized clinical trials. However, randomization ensures balance between groups, whereas nonrandomized studies are often biased by between-group differences. Efforts to reduce the cost and complexity of clinical trials are preferable to relying on observational studies.

Citation impact

471
total citations
FWCI
69.55
Percentile
100%
References
33
Citations per year

Authors

4

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Observational study
  • Medicine
  • Randomization
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Clinical trial
  • MAGIC (telescope)
  • Surgery
  • Internal medicine
No related works found for this paper.